home email

Edmund Halley

b. London, England 29 October 1656
d. Greenwich, England 14 January 1743


Edmond Halley, born into a wealthy family, was tutored at home until being sent first to St. Paul's School and then, at age 17, to Queen's College, Oxford. At age 22 he received an MA degree from Oxford.

Halley was elected to the Royal Society in 1678. He edited the Philosophical Transactions of the Royal Society from 1685 to 1693. He obtained the Savilian chair of geometry at Oxford in 1704, was appointed astronomer royal in 1720, and elected to the Acadèmie Royale des Sciences at Paris in 1729. Of course, he is most famous for having computed the orbit of the comet named after him.


The Breslau table

Many members of the Royal Society had been anxious for records suitable for construction of a life table. Their request was finally answered in 1693 with publication of the Breslau table.

Caspar Neumann (1648–1715) had studied for the ministry. In 1678, he became deacon at St. Mary Magdeline in Breslau, Silesia. Records had been kept in Breslau concerning age, sex, year and month of death for many years. Neumann examined the records beginning with the year 1687 and sent his observations to Gottfried Leibnitz who in turn informed Justell, Secretary of the Royal Society of their existence. The secretary wrote a request to Neumann who then forwarded his data for the years 1687 to 1691. The Royal Society asked Edmund Halley to analyze the data. Halley published his researches in 1693 in the paper An Estimate of the Degree of the Mortality of Mankind.

Under the assumption that the population of Breslau had been a stationary population for many decades, Halley concluded that a table which displayed the number of people at each age must also display the chances of mortality at each age. An analysis of the Breslau data permitted Halley to construct the following table. This table shows the number of individuals living at each age. Thus, for example, there are 1000 children of age 1.

Halley's Breslau Table

Age

No.

Age

No.

Age

No.

Age

No.

Age

No.

Age

No.

1

1000

15

628

29

539

43

417

57

272

71

131

2

855

16

622

30

531

44

407

58

262

72

120

3

798

17

616

31

523

45

397

59

252

73

109

4

760

18

610

32

515

46

387

60

242

74

98

5

732

19

604

33

507

47

377

61

232

75

88

6

710

20

598

34

499

48

367

62

222

76

78

7

692

21

592

35

490

49

357

63

212

77

68

8

680

22

586

36

481

50

346

64

202

78

58

9

670

23

579

37

472

51

335

65

192

79

49

10

661

24

573

38

463

52

324

66

182

80

41

11

653

25

567

39

454

53

313

67

172

81

34

12

646

26

560

40

445

54

302

68

162

82

28

13

640

27

553

41

436

55

292

69

152

83

23

14

624

28

546

42

427

56

282

70

142

84

20

The number living by year is plotted below. It should be noted how strikingly different a correct life function differs from that conjectured by Graunt. Also note the terrible toll taken by infant mortality.

There are some inconsistencies. Halley supposed that there are 1238 births annually in Breslau. Of these, 348 died within the first year of life leaving only 890 to achieve one year of age.  Notice that he has 1000 living at age 1 instead. In addition, another 198 died in the five years between age 1 and age 6. Therefore, only 692 survived to age 6. He has 710. If we wish to preserve the ratio of number living at age 6 to number of births, that is the ratio of 692 to 1238, then we must take the number of births to be 1270.

Another problem is that Halley did not give a maximum lifetime. Note there yet remain 20 survivors at age 84. It seems to have been customary when using the Breslau table to assign 0 survivors to age 86.

With the considerations given above, Halley's table can be collapsed so as to correspond to that of Graunt.

Age

0

6

16

26

36

46

56

66

76

86

Number living

1270

710

622

560

481

387

282

182

78

0